WhatsApp Privacy Policy: European users treated differently, govt tells HC

The Central Government on Monday informed the that it is looking at issues related to stemming out of the new privacy policy of Facebook-owned messaging giant

A communication had been sent to to respond to queries related to this matter, Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma told the Court. He also mentioned that there is a differential treatment between Indian and European users when it comes to the new privacy policy and this was a matter of concern for the government.

“The privacy policy offered to European users (which gives them the option to opt out)… is not given to Indian users. This differential treatment is a cause of concern,” said Sharma, according to law platform Bar & Bench. “WhatsApp prima facie seems to be treating the (Indian) users with an all-or-nothing approach. This leverages social significance of WhatsApp to force users into a bargain which may infringe (on privacy and data security).”

ALSO READ: Sustained volume gains at McDonald’s a key trigger for Westlife stock

Earlier a petition was preferred by advocate Chaitanya Rohilla, which said the new privacy policy of WhatsApp violates the right to privacy, guaranteed under the Constitution of India. The petition has sought a direction to the Central government to exercise its powers under the Information Technology Act and ensure that WhatsApp does not share any data of its users with any third party or and its companies.

The primary contention of the petitioner is that the new policy ‘virtually gives a 360-degree profile into a person’s online activity’, without any ‘government oversight’, and ‘takes away the choice’ of a user to not share his data with other Facebook-owned apps and third-party apps. The petition has highlighted there is no clarity on the extent to which data will be shared. It raises questions about what will be done with the sensitive data of users.

Referring to the petition, Sharma said that the concerned authorities are looking at the Data Protection Bill. He said it is being discussed by the Joint Parliamentary Committee. The submissions were made before a Single Judge Bench of Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva.

Last week, in the Court, the counsel for the petitioner, advocate Manohar Lal had contended that there should be some law, as everything that a user was doing was being analysed by WhatsApp. This included personal messages and browsing history. The Court had said that several other platforms also did the same and not just Whatsapp alone. Senior Counsel appearing for WhatsApp and had submitted that the private WhatsApp chats were completely encrypted. They had said the petition itself is not maintainable.

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

Source link